|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROB'S PICK
I’ve been collaborating with the
Social Finance Institute to develop the
Impact-First Investing (IFI) Tool, a free, interactive resource designed to help philanthropists explore how impact-first investments could fit within their broader charitable capital strategy. Created for foundations, donor-advised fund account holders, family offices, and other mission-driven investors, the IFI Tool allows users to model how different allocations of grants, market-rate investments, and impact-first investments may affect projected social impact and financial returns over time.
For many philanthropists, their charitable capital sits in traditional market-rate accounts and flows out as one-time grants. Both traditional investments and traditional giving have their place, but many high-potential solutions fall between those categories. Impact-first investing offers one answer, providing patient, flexible capital that prioritizes impact over return, with the possibility of repayment over time. The IFI Tool offers a concrete way to model trade-offs that are often implicit, allowing users to better understand the implications of different assumptions about returns, impact, and duration. The model and supplemental case studies enable users to explore the potential value of adding IFIs to their portfolios.
Robert Gertner is the Frank P. and Marianne R. Diassi Distinguished Service Professor of Economics and Strategy and John Edwardson Faculty Director Rustandy Center for Social Sector Innovation.
|
|
|
|
|
CAROLINE'S PICK
I just wrapped up teaching in Booth’s Perspectives on Capitalism course, and AI is the zeitgeist. As we read Karl Marx and Adam Smith, students repeatedly returned to the same question: What effect will AI have on labor and on livelihoods?
To make sense of where we may be headed, I’ve been reading my colleague Alex Imas'
Substack. As AI commoditizes more of the economy, Chicago Booth's
Alex Imas argues that spending and employment will migrate toward the “relational sector”—jobs and services with a distinctly human element, such as nursing, teaching, therapy, and hospitality.
“Human presence and connections will become scarce and therefore economically valuable,” he says.
Imas’ argument is an important reminder that some things cannot be commoditized, and that the demand for human connection, judgment, and ingenuity persists.
Caroline Grossman, MBA ’03, is the executive director of the Rustandy Center and adjunct associate professor of strategy.
|
|
|
|
|
EVENTS & NEWS
The Financial Wire: Chicago Booth’s Amir Sufi: Bank of America data shows more households stuck paycheck to paycheck.
Marketplace: Salaried workers have a tougher time than hourly workers at increasing their wages by getting a new job, says Chicago Booth’s Erik Hurst.
Chicago Booth Review: How to Supercharge Tiny Businesses
Chicago Booth Review: AI Works Better When It’s a Little Bit Human
CBR Podcast: Why Is Housing So Segregated?
The Inquiry: Can Brussels crack the gender pay gap?: Chicago Booth’s Marianne Bertrand discusses how gender norms contribute to the gender pay gap.
Rustandy Stories: Lighthouse Solutions Wins the 2026 Edwardson SNVC
Rustandy Stories: Global Launchpad: Strengthening Hong Kong’s Social Impact Entrepreneurs
Read our
past issues. Have an article to recommend?
Email us.
|
|
|
|